site stats

Nitisha v. union of india

WebbAddressing the background of the dispute, the judgment described this as “a quest for equality of opportunity for women seeking PCs”. As the Court observed, “a decade … Webb31 jan. 2024 · This note analyses the recent landmark case of Lt Col Nitisha v Union of India, dated 25 March 2024, where the Supreme Court of India formally recognised the …

Lt. Col. Nitisha vs Union of India: The Supreme Court Recognises ...

WebbFör 1 timme sedan · Jaipur, Apr 14 (PTI) Union Minister Darshana Jardosh on Friday said India is rapidly moving towards a women-led development and stressed that the … WebbHome SUPREME COURT OF INDIA djn plumbing and heating https://veritasevangelicalseminary.com

CASE COMMENT: MANINDERJIT SINGH BITTA V. UNION OF INDIA …

WebbMoreover, the constitutional validity of these algorithms can be challenged in light of cases such as Lt. Col. Nitisha v. Union of India [72] and Madhu v. Northern Railways [73] , which have held that policies that are neutral on paper but discriminatory in practice can violate the right against discrimination (systemic discrimination). Webb4 sep. 2024 · NITISHA V. UNION OF INDIA – The Criminal and Constitutional Law Blog. CASE COMMENTARY: LT COL. NITISHA V. UNION OF INDIA. The authors of … WebbFaculty of LAW crawler cmp 240

Indirect discrimination at workplace is most complicated?

Category:Sumit Jain - Senior Resident Fellow - Centre for Competition

Tags:Nitisha v. union of india

Nitisha v. union of india

Shocked CJI puts Defence Ministry on notice over discrimination of ...

http://www.lawfaculty.du.ac.in/files/LLB/LLBCM2024/IVth%20Term_International%20Institution_LB4032_2024.pdf Webb8 apr. 2024 · 08/Apr/2024. New Delhi: On April 5, the Supreme Court reprimanded the defence ministry for accusations of unfair treatment and discrimination in the promotion of women Indian Army officers who had ...

Nitisha v. union of india

Did you know?

WebbNITISHA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln.(s) for APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS, EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT, INTERVENTION APPLICATION, PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES and STAY) WITH W.P.(C) No.1480/2024 (X) Webb13 okt. 2024 · On 13.10.2024, Justices Hemant Gupta and Sudhanshu Dhulia delivered a split verdict in the Karnataka Hijab Ban case. Justice Gupta, on his penultimate day at the Supreme Court before retirement, held that the Karnataka High Court decision upholding the ban was correct. He dismissed all appeals to the High Court decision.

Webb10 mars 2024 · Union of India, 2024 SCC OnLine SC 261 emphasized, discrimination both direct and indirect is contrary to vision of substantive equality under Articles 14, 15 and 16; discrimination is not always a function or product of a conscious design or intent and may result by an unconscious bias or a failure to recognize unequal impacts which … http://nujslawreview.org/2024/07/02/nitisha-v-union-of-india-furthering-a-discussion-on-discriminatory-intent/

WebbUnion of India, (2024) 3 SCC 39; Secretary, Ministry of Defence v. Babita Puniya, (2024) 7 SCC 469; Union of India v. Lt. Cdr. Annie Nagaraja, (2024) 13 SCC 1; Lt. Col. Nitisha v. Union of India, 2024 SCC OnLine SC 261. questions remain unanswered and interpretative strategies unexplored. Webbför 15 timmar sedan · The Union minister’s announcement came as a big relief to employees of the steel plant, which was set up in 1982 after a prolonged agitation that …

Webb1 juli 2024 · LT. COL. NITISHA V. UNION OF INDIA[14]: INDIRECT DISCRIMINATION IN GRANTING OF PCS? A PC in army means to serve until one retires. This was one of the major concerns related not only to career but also equality. In 2024, the Supreme Court finally in Babita Puniya’s case decided to grant PC to women.

Webb27 okt. 2024 · The Division Bench of Justices DY Chandrachud and BV Nagarathna was hearing a batch of contempt petitions by 36 officers who had raised a grievance over the non-compliance of the Court's earlier judgment in Lt. Col. Nitisha and Others v. Union of India and Others. crawler claw wow classicWebbUNION OF INDIA Respondent(s) (FOR ADMISSION IA No. 161941/2024 - APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION IA No. 161944/2024 – CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION IA No. 193653/2024 - crawler city 2023Webb26 mars 2024 · In a judgment delivered yesterday, Lt. Col Nitisha vs Union of India, the Supreme Court – speaking through a bench of Chandrachud and Shah JJ – held … djnz r0 label is how many bit instructionWebbAccording to the Union of India, "the criteria of medical fitness applied for grant of permanent commission, are exactly the same as applicable to other SSC officers". Whenever the Special No. 5 Selection Board of an SSC officer is deferred and is held subsequently after the passage of one or two years, an officer has to undertake a fresh … djo aftershowWebb8 apr. 2024 · CRUX: Lt Col. Nitisha v. Union of India (25th March, 2024) -The present case deals with the issue of discrimination in granting of permanent commission of … djn wrightWebbCol Nitisha vs Union of India 2 came to remove the prevailing inequalities suffered by women of the Indian Army due to unwanted gender discrimination. In this case commentary, the author seeks to analyze the long battles which… Show more Women have been involved in various dimensions from homemakers to Bread Owners. crawler cocoonWebb3 sep. 2013 · Union of India, holding that Information Commissions are judicial tribunals performing “functions of wide magnitude,” including functions of judicial and quasi-judicial nature. Moreover, the Information Commission “is a judicial tribunal having the essential trappings of a Court” (para. 5), and disclosure of information may “involve the question … crawler cameras for drains